2002 Statistics for rec.sport.unicycling

Deze pagina in het Nederlands

 

Like last year, I have done some silly statistics on the message traffic that has gone on in the newsgroup rec.sport.unicycling. Here are some results, including a few new categories. Hey guys and girls, your posting habits are revealed without mercy...

Disclaimers and how-I-did-it are at the bottom of the page.

Overall newsgroup activity level 
Posts per weekday 
Top 100 posters (table) 
Top 10 posters (chart) 
Top 10 subjects 
Share of posts from unicyclist.com (2001 and 2002!) 
Are unicyclists creative? (You bet!)
Disclaimers and how-I-did-it 
© Klaas Bil January 2003

Overall newsgroup activity level

In 2002, a total of 31571 messages were posted to the newsgroup, by a total of 843 posters. The overall number of posts per day has varied quite a bit. There was one day with only 8 posts (2 March), while the record day was 14 October, sporting a mere 214 posts. Continuing last year's trend, the newsgroup has clearly become busier over the year (the statistics for 2001 are here for comparison). If I may say, I sometimes found it no pleasure anymore to plough through so many posts. It also occurred to me that some members of the forum seemed to think they were in a chatbox as opposed to a web-based interface to a newsgroup. Oh well, I'll stop ranting here. 

In the picture above, the number of posts has been smoothed using a running average (using a one-week window so no effect of weekly trends). 

The message count towards the end of July may be too low due to my missing some posts while being on holiday (even though I did my best to make manual corrections based on another source).

 

Posts per weekday

It is noteworthy that in weekends less messages get posted although the effect is not as large as in 2001. I guess some people are too busy unicycling in the weekend to post (or too tired from riding). Other than that, posts are pretty evenly distributed.

 

Top 100 posters (table)

The table below gives the 100 most prolific posters (in total, 843 people have posted at least once in 2002). The order has been based firstly on the number of posts during the year, secondly (if that was inconclusive) on the average number of lines per post, and thirdly on the (low) number of lines quoted, i.e. more original content. Sorry if you have to strain your eyes, I wasn't sure how big all of your screens are. 

The meaning of the other columns is as follows, taking harper as an example: harper posted 1487* times in 2002, the text body of his posts consisted of 25 lines on average, of which 13.90% was quoted from previous messages. 4.70% of all the posts in the group were from harper, with which he occupied 4.30% of the total number of bytes posted in 2002. Finally, 6.68% of the newsgroup posts in January were posted by harper, 7.03% in February, etc.

* Before Greg brings out his Mutant Giant Slide Rule, that's a sustained average of just over 4 posts per day!

 

#
name
# of 
msgs
avg 
msg 
lines
%
quoted
%
group 
msgs
%
group 
bytes
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
1 harper 1487 25 13.90% 4.70% 4.30% 6.68% 7.03% 4.97% 6.93% 6.00% 4.05% 4.44% 3.65% 2.43% 3.55% 4.25% 4.93%
2 jagur 1319 18 14.50% 4.20% 2.50% 4.12% 3.49% 2.84% 7.10% 5.03% 4.20% 4.82% 3.98% 3.34% 4.07% 2.15% 5.09%
3 rhysling 1180 28 15.00% 3.70% 3.70% 6.07% 8.19% 6.19% 6.27% 4.27% 0.14% 1.50% 3.65% 0.98% 4.35% 4.07% 2.36%
4 Klaas Bil 1018 20 25.20% 3.20% 2.90% 5.12% 4.49% 4.45% 4.41% 2.98% 2.68% 4.21% 1.45% 3.37% 2.53% 3.26% 2.20%
5 John Foss 895 32 18.60% 2.80% 4.60% 4.62% 4.38% 3.74% 4.70% 6.57% 7.71% 2.86% 3.06% 0.20% 0.03% 0 0
6 AccordNSX 867 14 14.20% 2.70% 1.30% 6.90% 3.12% 1.74% 3.55% 2.08% 1.85% 2.34% 8.98% 2.90% 0.22% 0.73% 0.63%
7 yoopers 827 22 18.70% 2.60% 2.20% 0.11% 0.74% 0.65% 0.95% 1.33% 1.19% 1.48% 6.18% 5.97% 2.86% 2.65% 3.68%
8 john_childs 776 28 17.20% 2.50% 2.80% 1.78% 2.01% 2.39% 2.31% 2.12% 3.08% 2.15% 2.07% 2.70% 2.61% 2.59% 3.02%
9 Phil 610 23 14.50% 1.90% 1.60% 0.11% 0.21% 0 0.04% 0.22% 2.60% 4.07% 2.80% 1.15% 3.77% 3.35% 2.17%
10 Sofa 594 19 13.40% 1.90% 1.30% 0 0 2.52% 1.20% 1.90% 2.75% 1.92% 1.09% 2.46% 0 2.44% 3.93%
11 Mikefule 573 31 13.30% 1.80% 2.60% 0 0 0 0 1.94% 2.35% 3.18% 1.91% 2.19% 3.00% 2.12% 2.54%
12 Animation 549 33 9.30% 1.70% 1.90% 0.67% 5.49% 2.77% 2.85% 3.09% 1.23% 2.10% 0.26% 1.21% 0.63% 1.86% 0.79%
13 U-Turn 526 21 16.60% 1.70% 1.40% 0 0 1.48% 1.82% 3.38% 1.45% 1.17% 0.53% 1.52% 2.56% 2.18% 2.29%
14 GILD 512 27 9.50% 1.60% 1.20% 0 0.37% 0.45% 2.27% 1.15% 2.42% 3.09% 2.30% 1.65% 1.18% 2.04% 1.45%
15 UniDak 485 18 16.60% 1.50% 1.10% 1.84% 4.38% 5.68% 4.50% 2.87% 2.10% 0.10% 0.26% 0.51% 0.14% 0 0.13%
16 andrew_carter 459 24 13.10% 1.50% 1.60% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.13% 4.68% 5.38% 3.14%
17 Checkernuts 423 23 12.20% 1.30% 1.20% 0 0 0 0.74% 0.18% 1.52% 2.52% 2.14% 1.38% 1.38% 1.80% 2.70%
18 Scott Kurland 369 23 36.80% 1.20% 1.10% 0 0 0.45% 0.45% 0.90% 2.17% 1.22% 1.61% 3.00% 1.68% 0.87% 0.35%
19 sendhair 348 28 11.90% 1.10% 1.20% 0 0 0 0 0 2.32% 3.23% 4.47% 2.66% 0 0 0
20 Dylan Wallinger 340 7 12.50% 1.10% 0.20% 1.22% 1.06% 1.10% 0.91% 0.83% 1.66% 1.76% 0.89% 0.74% 0.80% 0.81% 1.48%
21 Nathan Hoover 315 27 41.00% 1.00% 1.20% 1.78% 1.48% 3.10% 0.04% 0.40% 0.65% 0.67% 0.72% 1.48% 0.74% 0.87% 1.26%
22 nbrazzi 293 26 16.10% 0.90% 1.00% 0 0 0 0 1.44% 1.09% 1.78% 2.86% 0.71% 1.02% 0.87% 0.31%
23 David Stone 284 32 27.30% 0.90% 1.40% 2.00% 1.64% 0.32% 1.28% 1.80% 1.09% 0.52% 0.43% 0.74% 0.77% 0.61% 0.19%
24 Scott Stephens 283 22 9.60% 0.90% 0.70% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.38% 2.20% 3.20% 1.63%
25 JJuggle 264 39 18.70% 0.80% 1.30% 0 0 0 0 0.47% 0.22% 0.65% 0.13% 1.99% 1.93% 1.86% 1.07%
26 Arnold the Aardvark 262 16 10.90% 0.80% 0.40% 0.39% 0.48% 0.52% 1.11% 0.90% 0.76% 0.76% 1.45% 1.52% 0.63% 0.55% 0.57%
27 Drewnicycle 258 15 16.70% 0.80% 0.40% 1.22% 1.27% 1.10% 0.62% 0.50% 1.09% 0.75% 0.62% 1.01% 0.66% 0.47% 0.97%
28 teachndad 255 26 8.60% 0.80% 0.70% 0.83% 0.74% 0.52% 0.58% 0.93% 1.09% 0.61% 0.92% 0.74% 0.77% 0.76% 0.97%
29 johnfoss 242 41 12.60% 0.80% 1.50% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.65% 1.16% 2.68% 1.85%
30 evilewan 242 27 15.90% 0.80% 0.70% 0 0 0 0 0 0.43% 1.03% 0.36% 0.98% 1.68% 1.54% 1.70%
31 Max_Dingemans 236 18 17.00% 0.70% 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.33% 0.96% 2.58%
32 Roger Davies 231 51 44.20% 0.70% 1.50% 0.89% 1.95% 1.16% 0.54% 0.68% 0.72% 0.57% 0.46% 0.74% 0.74% 0.35% 0.66%
33 Joe Marshall 231 28 26.00% 0.70% 1.00% 0.83% 0.90% 2.00% 1.53% 1.11% 0.98% 0.76% 1.09% 0.30% 0.41% 0 0
34 Gilby 226 20 15.80% 0.70% 0.50% 3.12% 1.95% 0.58% 0.37% 0.11% 0.22% 0.10% 1.32% 0.88% 0.55% 0.38% 0.16%
35 unicus 221 28 19.80% 0.70% 0.80% 0 0 0 0 1.04% 1.45% 1.67% 0.56% 1.99% 1.13% 0 0
36 Unispin 196 20 13.60% 0.60% 0.40% 0 0 0 0 0 0.72% 1.08% 0.62% 1.75% 1.62% 0.32% 0.41%
37 Michael Grant 178 38 43.10% 0.60% 0.80% 0.45% 0.16% 0.26% 0.37% 0.54% 1.30% 1.43% 0.62% 0.78% 0.61% 0.26% 0
38 Jason 177 25 19.80% 0.50% 0.60% 0 0 0 0 0 0.72% 1.22% 0.72% 1.32% 0.61% 0.84% 0.60%
39 Mojoe 172 20 12.50% 0.50% 0.40% 0 0 1.16% 0.54% 0.47% 0.80% 0.57% 0.49% 0.47% 0.50% 0.58% 0.85%
40 Danny Colyer 168 23 16.20% 0.50% 0.60% 0.17% 0.42% 0.77% 0.87% 0.93% 0.54% 0.62% 0.43% 0.64% 0.39% 0.12% 0.63%
41 Sarah Miller 161 25 15.90% 0.50% 0.60% 0.95% 0.69% 0.58% 0.91% 0.57% 0.80% 1.24% 0.26% 0.34% 0.17% 0.12% 0.25%
42 brokenframe 160 20 11.90% 0.50% 0.50% 0 0 0.77% 0.37% 2.44% 1.85% 0.05% 0.10% 0.27% 0.14% 0.03% 0.06%
43 GizmoDuck 157 26 17.10% 0.50% 0.50% 0 0 0 0.25% 0.90% 0 0.70% 0.53% 1.18% 0.66% 0.67% 0.41%
44 ekimstorm 154 21 17.40% 0.50% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10% 0.13% 2.33% 1.49% 0.52% 0.22%
45 Maxfield D 151 13 5.00% 0.50% 0.30% 1.39% 0.42% 1.87% 1.03% 0.86% 0.65% 0.52% 0.10% 0.10% 0.08% 0 0.06%
46 gluteous maximus 149 25 13.70% 0.50% 0.40% 0 0 0 0 0 0.14% 0.10% 0.36% 0 0.41% 1.40% 2.17%
47 gauss 146 23 14.90% 0.50% 0.50% 0 0.05% 0.77% 0.91% 0.97% 1.09% 0.24% 0.33% 0.40% 0.50% 0.20% 0.06%
48 Kris Holm 142 36 44.50% 0.40% 0.80% 1.34% 1.06% 1.42% 0 0.90% 0.94% 0.38% 0.53% 0.03% 0 0 0
49 Tmornstar 142 26 8.40% 0.40% 0.50% 0 0.05% 0.45% 0.62% 0.07% 0.04% 0.57% 0.53% 0.51% 0.58% 1.11% 0.44%
50 Doug Massey 141 29 27.60% 0.40% 0.50% 0.33% 0.21% 0.65% 0.74% 0.47% 0.69% 0.52% 0.23% 0.30% 0.63% 0.38% 0.25%
51 Tom Holub 135 20 0.50% 0.40% 0.40% 0.28% 0.58% 0.52% 0.70% 0.72% 0.54% 0.33% 0.30% 0.47% 0.17% 0.23% 0.47%
52 m_extreme_uni 133 21 13.80% 0.40% 0.30% 0 0 0 0.12% 0.04% 0.11% 0.05% 0.03% 0.24% 0.63% 0.90% 1.98%
53 JoeRowing 132 23 13.70% 0.40% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.47% 0 1.89% 0.88%
54 dan 131 41 19.50% 0.40% 0.80% 0 0.05% 0 0.66% 1.15% 0.69% 0.98% 0.92% 0.30% 0.11% 0 0.03%
55 bagpiperboy 131 20 14.50% 0.40% 0.30% 0.39% 0 0.32% 0 0.47% 0.98% 0.33% 1.05% 0.78% 0.03% 0.20% 0.28%
56 Graeme 129 31 16.40% 0.40% 0.50% 0 0 0 0.58% 0.25% 0.65% 0.79% 0.46% 0.17% 0.66% 0.67% 0.22%
57 Joe 127 25 21.70% 0.40% 0.40% 0.17% 0.74% 0.32% 0.04% 0.43% 0.51% 1.10% 1.09% 0.54% 0.06% 0.09% 0.03%
58 gbarnes 126 28 10.80% 0.40% 0.40% 0.11% 0.05% 0.65% 0.87% 0.22% 0.36% 0.86% 0.39% 0.37% 0.55% 0.09% 0.38%
59 foxx 126 22 19.00% 0.40% 0.20% 0.28% 0.32% 0.90% 0.62% 0.40% 0.36% 0.52% 0.16% 0.61% 0.66% 0.12% 0.09%
60 Ben Plotkin-Swing 122 25 14.50% 0.40% 0.40% 0.89% 0.58% 1.23% 0.25% 0.57% 0.18% 0.33% 0.13% 0.51% 0.28% 0.23% 0.16%
61 Catboy 122 22 13.60% 0.40% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.77% 1.28% 1.57%
62 Jeff Lutkus 120 35 36.50% 0.40% 0.60% 3.56% 1.95% 0.52% 0.29% 0.07% 0 0.10% 0 0 0 0 0
63 Jack Halpern 116 44 0.40% 0.40% 0.70% 1.06% 0.11% 0.13% 0.33% 0.22% 0.62% 0.91% 0.23% 0.20% 0.17% 0.41% 0.31%
64 nikkifrog 112 22 13.70% 0.40% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03% 0.07% 1.62% 1.05% 0.44%
65 Memphis Mud 111 24 10.40% 0.40% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.69% 1.34% 1.26%
66 leow 110 25 18.20% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0.80% 0.95% 0.85% 0.78% 0.17% 0.15% 0.25%
67 Neil Dunlop 109 41 20.50% 0.30% 0.60% 0.78% 1.00% 0.97% 0.41% 0.36% 0.58% 0.91% 0.20% 0 0 0 0
68 Erin 108 23 13.10% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09% 0.66% 0.13% 0.61% 0.73% 1.10%
69 Unicyco 104 22 16.00% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0.11% 0.18% 0.38% 0.82% 1.55% 0.47% 0 0
70 RancidFlannel 101 21 13.70% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0.18% 1.68% 1.12% 0.74% 0 0.06% 0.06%
71 uni_boy50 101 18 11.80% 0.30% 0.20% 0 0.53% 0.39% 0.17% 0.04% 0.14% 0.19% 0.26% 0.71% 0.47% 0.26% 0.53%
72 Johnny B 100 22 36.50% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0.16% 3.74% 1.20% 0.36% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
73 ChxWitBrix@aol.com 96 32 11.30% 0.30% 0.60% 0 0 0 0 0 3.40% 0.10% 0 0 0 0 0
74 showard 96 31 9.00% 0.30% 0.40% 0.11% 0.42% 0.65% 0.12% 0.11% 0.29% 0.23% 0.26% 0.40% 0.25% 0.44% 0.41%
75 JonnyD 96 19 11.60% 0.30% 0.20% 0.72% 0.26% 0.19% 0.17% 0 0.62% 0.47% 0.56% 0.37% 0.17% 0.12% 0.19%
76 fred 95 24 15.50% 0.30% 0.20% 0 0.48% 0.58% 0.83% 0.07% 0.04% 0 0 0.34% 0.39% 0.38% 0.41%
77 Jason Neumann 92 23 32.60% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0.14% 0.36% 1.08% 0.99% 0.81% 0 0 0.03%
78 The Homey of Uni 91 22 15.10% 0.30% 0.20% 0 0.11% 0.13% 0.37% 0.97% 0.33% 0.14% 0.26% 0.20% 0.36% 0.23% 0.13%
79 Darren Bedford 89 34 43.40% 0.30% 0.40% 0.45% 0.05% 0.26% 0.25% 0.29% 0.22% 0.14% 0 0.17% 0.28% 0.41% 0.75%
80 leo 89 31 23.50% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0.69% 1.29% 0.70% 0.07% 0.54% 0.47% 0.07% 0.27% 0.03% 0 0.03%
81 nb 89 18 14.10% 0.30% 0.20% 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.17% 0.16% 0.34% 0.30% 0.58% 0.57%
82 unibiker 87 32 13.90% 0.30% 0.40% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.42% 1.05% 0.24% 0.69% 0.20% 0.22%
83 Ando 87 19 10.70% 0.30% 0.20% 0.83% 0.26% 0.52% 0.87% 0.40% 0.07% 0.19% 0.07% 0 0.19% 0.20% 0.16%
84 Phil Himsworth 86 23 21.40% 0.30% 0.20% 0.17% 0.58% 0.32% 0.58% 1.51% 0.07% 0.24% 0.10% 0 0 0.03% 0
85 daino149 85 25 13.00% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0.07% 0 0 0 0 0.30% 1.34% 0.82%
86 dustin 82 34 20.40% 0.30% 0.40% 0 0 0 0 0.43% 0.62% 0 0.46% 1.15% 0.14% 0 0
87 UniBrier 81 27 9.80% 0.30% 0.30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10% 0.13% 0.66% 0.84% 0.66%
88 tron 79 25 11.70% 0.20% 0.30% 0.56% 0.58% 0.32% 0.04% 0 0.40% 1.26% 0.20% 0.17% 0 0.03% 0.06%
89 Mark Wiggins 77 28 24.90% 0.20% 0.30% 0.06% 0.26% 0.45% 0.17% 0.14% 0.22% 0.14% 0.03% 0.27% 0.25% 0.73% 0.13%
90 Carol McLean 76 36 16.40% 0.20% 0.30% 0.06% 0.21% 0.32% 0.29% 0.29% 0.36% 0.38% 0.36% 0.17% 0.14% 0.09% 0.28%
91 Noel.Holland 76 29 13.70% 0.20% 0.30% 0 0.21% 0.32% 1.61% 0.54% 0.33% 0 0.10% 0 0 0 0.03%
92 Ken Fuchs 74 47 24.40% 0.20% 0.60% 0 0 0.06% 0.37% 0.25% 0.87% 0 0 0.40% 0.30% 0.23% 0.06%
93 David Straitjacket 73 31 19.20% 0.20% 0.30% 1.00% 1.43% 1.03% 0.33% 0.07% 0.07% 0 0 0 0 0 0
94 cybeross 72 23 13.70% 0.20% 0.20% 0 0 0 0 0 0.40% 1.17% 0.66% 0.40% 0.11% 0 0
95 Paul Selwood 71 21 26.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.22% 0.16% 0 0.25% 0.22% 0.58% 0 0.07% 0.24% 0.19% 0.23% 0.22%
96 SpYdeR v1o 70 21 13.50% 0.20% 0.20% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.59% 0.27% 0 0.06% 1.32%
97 jimmytrialsrider 69 24 7.80% 0.20% 0.20% 0.89% 0.58% 0.45% 0.25% 0.32% 0.22% 0.14% 0 0.03% 0 0.29% 0
98 justin_kozy 69 15 14.60% 0.20% 0.10% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03% 0.44% 0.39% 0.87% 0.35%
99 John Zanetti 62 27 41.10% 0.20% 0.20% 1.73% 1.64% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
100 willfcc 61 19 14.00% 0.20% 0.10% 0 0.16% 0.45% 0.41% 0.36% 0.14% 0.05% 0 0.07% 0.50% 0.17% 0

 

Top 10 posters (chart)

All of the top-10 posters were active throughout the year. Yes, it may seem from the pic that Phil didn't post in March, and John Foss didn't post in November and December, but I am almost sure that they are congruent with Phil Himsworth and johnfoss, respectively, who did post in those months. I think John finally abandoned the e-mail list subscription and changed his handle in the process, and Phil posts both from home and (too often?) from work (?) under different names. See also Disclaimers for, uhmm, disclaimers.

Towards the end of the year, a couple of new posters came on strong but they didn't quite make it to the top-10, and I felt that the picture would suffer from more data. Notably andrew_carter, number one poster for the last quarter alone, may well be heading for a shining appearance in the 2003 stats page if there is going to be one :-) 

Here's the activity log of the ten people that between themselves posted over 30% of all the 2002 posts:

 

 Top 10 subjects

The posts in 2002 were devoted to a total of 3984 threads, or rather subjects since a post that hasn't been replied to might technically not be called a thread. Oldbies will remember most if not all of the discussions, some of which were dead-serious (no pun intended), some were light-hearted, and some IMHO simply dragged on for too long. 

The subjects have been sorted to number of posts (and sent bytes if inconclusive). Had they been sorted according to bytes only, the New Low on Cokey thread would have won hands down; people simply had a lot to say about David Stone's use of a cell phone while Cokering the wrong way on Broadway, NY during rush hour! :-)

Anyway, here's the top 10:

#

subject

thread starter

number of posts

% of group posts

% of group bytes

1

tastelessness at unicon

Sarah Miller

112

0.35%

0.69%

2

wheel puzzle

gauss

88

0.28%

0.88%

3

Breaking RSU into many categories

Gilby

76

0.24%

0.33%

4

Your skill levels

SpYdeR v1o

68

0.22%

0.27%

5

Extremely advanced Coker

bronson

65

0.21%

0.28%

6

How Many is 2 Many?

Memphis Mud

63

0.20%

0.18%

7

New Low on Cokey: Near-death experience

David Stone

59

0.19%

1.24%

8

beer on unicycles

spokelerlarue

52

0.16%

0.16%

9

I'm going to try Marmite

yoopers

52

0.16%

0.14%

10

Tread Mills

Monkey Juggler

51

0.16%

0.19%

 

 Share of posts from unicyclist.com (2001 and 2002!)

Nowadays most people active in rec.sport.unicycling use the web-based interface of the forums on unicyclist.com, so niftily maintained by Gilby. He installed a two-way coupling so that every message posted to the forums is relayed to rsu and vice versa. (There is actually a three-way coupling because there exists also an e-mail list.) But the forums have not always been there! 

The forums at unicyclist.com were launched in March of 2001. They were used by a few people, but not all that many until Gilby actually included something other than the forums on the site (July 2001) and switched the free email service over to his own server (end of August 2001). Since then the largest increase in activity has happened and it's continuing to grow. 
Sidenote: apparently, initially the web address of Gilby's site included 'www' which was later dropped but somehow briefly reappeared in September 2001.

It would be interesting to further split the number of posts into e-mail list and Usenet news. I do have information on the software that people use to post (you see, not much escapes me :-)). It's a long list and I recognise quite some e-mail programs but I don't think that that means that they post via e-mail. I think that e.g. Microsoft Outlook can also be used for news access. Anyone?

By the end of 2002, over 85% of all posts came via the forums. However, I for one am not converted yet - please note that if I had not used a Usenet newsreader I could not have made this stats page.

 

Are unicyclists creative?

Some time ago a discussion raged in rec.sport.unicycling whether unicyclists are more intelligent than the general public. It was concluded, of course, that this is indeed the case. Now I am presenting evidence that unicyclists are also an uncannily creative lot, look at this partial alphabetic list of 2002 posters:

 

#
name
# of 
msgs
avg 
msg 
lines
%
quoted
%
group 
msgs
%
group 
bytes
406

Uni Cycle

4 29 26.90% 0.00% 0.00%
788

uni_boy345

1 10 10.00% 0.00% 0.00%
70

uni_boy50

101 18 11.80% 0.30% 0.20%
744

uni12345679

1 15 13.30% 0.00% 0.00%
213

uni57

18 32 13.50% 0.10% 0.10%
152

unibabyguy

37 19 18.50% 0.10% 0.10%
86

unibiker

82 32 13.90% 0.30% 0.40%
87

UniBrier

81 27 9.80% 0.30% 0.30%
261

unibrow

12 14 15.70% 0.00% 0.00%
263

UNICICLO@aol.com

11 34 14.90% 0.00% 0.10%
35

unicus

221 28 19.80% 0.70% 0.80%
271

unicycle dude

11 13 3.80% 0.00% 0.00%
796

unicycle

1 9 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
454

Unicycle17

3 24 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
157

unicycleboy

35 15 14.20% 0.10% 0.10%
402

UnicycleDK

4 35 13.90% 0.00% 0.00%
173

unicyclejoe

29 20 11.50% 0.10% 0.10%
375

unicyclekid

5 20 20.90% 0.00% 0.00%
843

Unicyclers@aol.com

1 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
324

Unicycling Productions

7 68 24.10% 0.00% 0.10%
789

unicyclist

1 10 60.00% 0.00% 0.00%
69

Unicyco

104 22 16.00% 0.30% 0.30%
15

UniDak

485 18 16.60% 1.50% 1.10%
179

Unifrank

26 28 26.10% 0.10% 0.10%
707

unigami

1 20 5.00% 0.00% 0.00%
136

unijess

41 25 11.00% 0.10% 0.10%
411

Unilady@aol.com

4 23 9.70% 0.00% 0.00%
676

unilaur

1 28 7.10% 0.00% 0.00%
293

unilor

9 22 10.90% 0.00% 0.00%
150

uni-man-dan

37 23 9.40% 0.10% 0.10%
240

Unimatrix 0-1

14 22 13.50% 0.00% 0.00%
761

unimom

1 13 15.40% 0.00% 0.00%
210

Unimoron

20 13 16.10% 0.10% 0.00%
348

UniPaul

6 23 9.00% 0.00% 0.00%
305

uniphiable

8 24 15.00% 0.00% 0.00%
308

uniphreak

8 22 6.70% 0.00% 0.00%
135

Unipickle

41 32 43.30% 0.10% 0.20%
178

uniracer

27 17 12.10% 0.10% 0.10%
321

unirider145

8 15 13.80% 0.00% 0.00%
289

uniryder

9 28 12.10% 0.00% 0.00%
119

uniryder777

48 19 11.80% 0.20% 0.10%
329

unisaurus

7 27 8.80% 0.00% 0.00%
36

Unispin

196 20 13.60% 0.60% 0.40%
101

unisteve

58 24 11.00% 0.20% 0.20%
225

unitulip

16 18 10.40% 0.10% 0.00%
332

Uniwitold

7 25 6.60% 0.00% 0.00%

 

Disclaimers and how-I-did-it

I have relied on the news server of my ISP as well as on a long-retention (but non-posting) free news server to view the newsgroup - but the servers may have missed some posts.

I have used Free Agent 1.21/32 to view and save all messages, trying to exclude spam while including replies of faithful posters to spam. However, some spam may have been saved and counted in, while some genuine posts may have been excluded.

Occasionally, messages show up twice or more. In those cases, messages are double (triple etc.) counted.

The date assigned to a post is not trivial. AFAIK, each post is date/time-stamped by the poster's own computer at the time of sending. Free Agent does convert that date/time stamp to my time zone (Central European). I don't know how Day Light Saving time is accounted for. We do have DST here during the summer, but some posters may not.

I have generated raw statistics using QDNStatsV2 (RtS#2) by Brett O'Callaghan. QDNStats pretends to generate web-ready reports but I think they're still quite tedious. Other than that it mostly works flawlessly.

QDNStats distinguishes posters by their names. Not so strange, most people do the same but QDNStats is very picky. For instance, "Joe Merrill", " Joe Merrill", "Merrill, Joe" and "merrill" are four different posters (who, incidentally, would have made it to the top-100 when added). See how subtle it gets? I noticed dozens of people whom I suspect posted under different names. I made no effort to correct this, partly because it would involve a lot of manual editing, and also how can I be sure that it indeed involves a single person? I mean, Mikefule is almost certainly Mikefule@aol.com, but does Sarah equate to Sarah Miller? Is aardvark the brother of Arnold the Aardvark? And that Animation is Lewis W Beard is something I know but it isn't obvious from looking at the names. So, sorry for those who used various handles, I simply couldn't cope with it (other than this).

Finally, I used Excel to post-process the QDNStats results, Paint Shop Pro to polish the graphics, and FrontPage to generate the html code.

 

All figures and text on this page (except thread subjects and people's names) © Klaas Bil January 2003

 

Back to Unicycling statistics.